Liberty of sustainable development?

[Sassy]

LIBERTY OR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT?
PART 13

By Michael Shaw

December 7, 2008

NewsWithViews.com

The issue is Liberty

Congressman Ron Paul, a constitutionalist said "This is not a conservative problem nor is it a liberal problem. It's a government intrusion problem that comes from both groups albeit for different reasons. The problems emanate from both camps that champion different programs for different reasons. The solution will come," he says, "when both groups realize that it is not merely a single party problem or just a liberal or a conservative problem." The problem is the abandonment of the principles of limited government. The issue is liberty.

Sustainable Development's populist 'anti thesis' was designed and delegated to left wing state collectivists. These collectivists rally rank and file liberals around the concepts of social justice and environmental protection. The "battle" between the left wing and the right wing moves society downward. The moves are left - right, step by step toward the new world order of Sustainable Development.

Sustainable Development is the synthesis of the contemporary political left/right dialectic. At the local level this synthesis is achieved though the process of "stakeholder" or "visioning" councils. These are the new American soviet.

Once the Sustainable synthesis or "consensus" occurs a police state will arise. America will experience what Al Gore proclaims will be "the wrenching transformation of America". Such is the path to Tyranny.

While right wing insiders benefit economically from Smart Growth policies the politically powerful left wing collectivists promote the anti-life, anti-liberty, and anti-property program titled The Wildlands Project. This combination of the two is the United Nations Agenda 21 land use program.
The federal executive branch's implementation of this political globalist agenda by has been continuous since at least 1989.

Agenda 21 seeks to regionalize America to the benefit of a shrinking number of political-economic insiders. Regionalism is the political system for state collectivist policies.

The Agenda 21 collectivism is designed to implement the United Nations Charter. This is the goal of Sustainable Development policy. The Charter of the United Nations' premise is the idea that ordinary human beings are "resources". The elite will arrange these resources into sustainable numbers of worker bees and bee keepers.

The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, Article 29 Section 3 declares that: "Rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations." Under the UN Charter your rights ultimately depend on your usefulness and compliance to the will of the elite. Ordinary human beings, including Americans, are to be transformed into chattel. When fully understood, Sustainable Development is seen as a spiritual battle.

Sustainable Development will transform America away from being a land of the free; where your life, your liberty and your property are yours; and where government is limited and subject to a higher authority. The Sustainable Development of the new world order is a political system designed by select and powerful men who operate behind the scenes. Their tools are mechanisms that monitor and control all human action; where they grant or revoke rights; and regard ordinary human beings as biological resources.
  con't @
http://www.newswithviews.com/Shaw/michael126.htm

[ScottA]

They'll have to get along without my help. Sorry NWO.

[taveuni13]

While I have always found libertarian views appealing philosophically, I also see how the 800 pound gorilla of population makes these mostly untenable.  Here are some instructive maps of the election.  The closer people are bumping into each other, the less appealing and untenable the libertarian view becomes.

Technology can provide a sustainable population a very high standard of living,  but the lust for wealth, power, and greed among the elite, and the narrow, lazy, and often barely literate thinking of the working and lower classes who too often don't look beyond the end of their noses, will always stand in the way of this ideal.

[wildbil]

I'm not really sure what the point is? Maybe I misread but does this mean that the "elite" want to use people as resources? I think we are already there.

[ScottA]

You can still choose not to be used yourself if you want.