Understanding Vapor Barriers

Started by MountainDon, January 03, 2011, 08:21:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MountainDon

It is a long article but is worth reading through. Use of vapor barriers, where and what, varies with climate. This should be read before building if at all possible. Or read it after to see what you might have done wrong.  ;D


BSD-106: Understanding Vapor Barriers

You need to scroll down a ways to get past the brick exterior. From some other readings it seems that the stucco exterior can be changed to other exterior finishes like cement board, wood siding, etc, but in that case only a single layer of building paper would be needed. Note the author always mentions building paper before house wrap.
This might also be a good place to link to a previous post of John's

http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-021-thermodynamics-its-not-rocket-science

I'm including a teaser below for those who need the first chapter to get interested...

Confusion on the issue of vapor barriers and air barriers is common. The confusion arises because air often holds a great deal of moisture in the vapor form. When this air moves from location to location due to an air pressure difference, the vapor moves with it. This is a type of migration of water vapor. In the strictest sense air barriers are also vapor barriers when they control the transport of moisture-laden air.

An excellent discussion about the differences between vapor barriers and air barriers can be found in Quirrouette (1985).

Vapor barriers are also a cold climate artifact that have diffused into other climates more from ignorance than need. The history of cold climate vapor barriers itself is a story based more on personalities than physics. Rose (1997) regales readers of this history. It is frightening indeed that construction practices can be so dramatically influenced by so little research and reassuring indeed that the inherent robustness of most building assemblies has been able to tolerate such foolishness.


So What is The Problem?

Incorrect use of vapor barriers is leading to an increase in moisture related problems. Vapor barriers were originally intended to prevent assemblies from getting wet. However, they often prevent assemblies from drying. Vapor barriers installed on the interior of assemblies prevent assemblies from drying inward. This can be a problem in any air-conditioned enclosure. This can be a problem in any below grade space. This can be a problem when there is also a vapor barrier on the exterior. This can be a problem where brick is installed over building paper and vapor permeable sheathing.


What Do We Really Want to Do?

Two seemingly simple requirements for building enclosures bedevil engineers and architects almost endlessly:

keep water out
let water out if it gets in
Water can come in several phases:  liquid, solid, vapor and adsorbed. The liquid phase as rain and ground water has driven everyone crazy for hundreds of years but can be readily understood - drain everything and remember the humble flashing. The solid phase also drives everyone crazy when we have to shovel it or melt it, but at least most professionals understand the related building problems (ice damming, frost heave, freeze-thaw damage). But the vapor phase is in a class of craziness all by itself. We will conveniently ignore the adsorbed phase and leave it for someone else to deal with. Note that adsorbed water is different than absorbed water (see Kumaran, Mitalas & Bomberg, 1994).

The fundamental principle of control of water in the liquid form is to drain it out if it gets in – and let us make it perfectly clear – it will get in if you build where it rains or if you put your building in the ground where there is water in the ground. This is easy to understand, logical, with a long historical basis.

The fundamental principle of control of water in the solid form is to not let it get solid and if it does – give it space or if it is solid not let it get liquid and if it does drain it away before it can get solid again. This is a little more difficult to understand, but logical and based on solid research. Examples of this principle include the use of air entrained concrete to control freeze-thaw damage and the use of attic venting to provide cold roof decks to control ice damming.

The fundamental principle of control of water in the vapor form is to keep it out and to let it out if it gets in. Simple right? No chance. It gets complicated because sometimes the best strategies to keep water vapor out also trap water vapor in. This can be a real problem if the assemblies start out wet because of rain or the use of wet materials.

It gets even more complicated because of climate. In general water vapor moves from the warm side of building assemblies to the cold side of building assemblies. This is simple to understand, except we have trouble deciding what side of a wall is the cold or warm side. Logically, this means we need different strategies for different climates. We also have to take into account differences between summer and winter.

Finally, complications arise when materials can store water. This can be both good and bad. A cladding system such as a brick veneer can act as a reservoir after a rainstorm and significantly complicate wall design. Alternatively, wood framing or masonry can act as a hygric buffer absorbing water lessening moisture shocks.

What is required is to define vapor control measures on a more regional climatic basis and to define the vapor control measures more precisely.

Part of the problem is that we struggle with names and terms. We have vapor retarders, we have vapor barriers, we have vapor permeable we have vapor impermeable, etc. What do these terms mean? It depends on whom you ask and whether they are selling something or arguing with a building official. In an attempt to clear up some of the confusion the following definitions are proposed:

Just because something has been done and has not failed, doesn't mean it is good design.

John Raabe

#1
Nice posting Don:

Lstiburek is such a great tech guy but can still write in an entertaining way...

I grabbed one of the maps that is valuable for finding your climate zone. Each zone has its own set of 'challenges" and special issues. This map can also help determine the appropriate heating and cooling system.



Here is a link to Case Studies of different projects for each climate zone. http://www.buildingscience.com/doctypes/designs-that-work/dtw-case-studies
Most of these are prototype and demonstration low-energy projects but the details of construction, water and vapor control, etc. can be used in less aggressive projects. 
None of us are as smart as all of us.