9/11 Anniversary

glenn kangiser · July 10, 2007, 11:38:02 PM

Seems Santorum knows things that haven't been made public knowledge yet.

Read the whole story. http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mac_mcki_070708_red_alert_3a_has_santo.htm

Red Alert: Has Santorum Let the Cat Out of the Bag?

Quote"In an alarming display of fearmongering, former Republican Senator Rick Santorum has suggested that a series of 'unfortunate events,' namely terrorist attacks, will occur within the next year and change American citizen's perception of the war.

"Santorum went on to clearly imply that terror attacks will occur inside America which will alter the body politic and lead to a reversal of the anti-war sentiment now dominating the country." (http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2007/070707changeview.htm )

Ex-Senator Santorum is doing one of two things, or both, in the following article. He is either fear-mongering and/or accidentally letting the cat out of the bag about new BLACK OPS terrorist attacks being planned right now to continue to enable, drive and justify the Neocon/Republican, home-grown Fourth Reich. This is almost inevitable along the pathway of negativity, to continuously reinforce fear and terror with more fear and terror. So be aware, aware, aware that more terrorist (read U.S. State-Sponsored Terror) attacks may be in the works this year and next, not at the hands of Osama bin Laden, who is quite likely dead anyway, but at the hands of our own murderous government. The Fascist elitists are losing control of our minds en masse, so they need to replay the 9/11-Reichstag Fire card all over again.

glenn kangiser · July 12, 2007, 08:29:47 AM

When 2 insiders start having gut feelings we should listen. They are planning a big surprise. This one is a known weasel from way back and has been on inside plans for a couple of decades at least.

QuoteChertoff's Gut: Al-Qaeda Could Strike This Summer
By Luke O'Brien EmailJuly 11, 2007 | 10:52:04 AMCategories: Threats

Portrait_chertoff Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, citing a "gut feeling" on Tuesday, told the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune that al-Qaeda could attack the United States this summer. Chertoff based his assessment on a personal hunch, admitting that there was not enough evidence of a pending attack to raise the nation's threat level. Rather, Chertoff had studied terrorist patterns and some undisclosed intel to come up with his determination.

"I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk," he said. "Summertime seems to be appealing to them."

Chertoff also took the opportunity to weigh in on the nation's immigration debate, saying that the failure to pass an immigration bill had made the country vulnerable.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/4958254.html

...of course he has a gut feeling-- he is likely in on the planning.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Briley/Patrick4.htm

Al-Qaeda is known the world over (except here) as a CIA created entity. http://educate-yourself.org/cn/alqaedagenenis09jul05.shtml

Why wouldn't they know what is going to happen?-- they pull the strings.

Hopefully enough people will figure them out ahead of time to prevent them from enacting the 9-11 sequel.

July 12, 2007, 11:10:37 AM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6738692477585096197&q=FDNY+guiliani&total=11&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=6

FDNY produced a video on Rudy Guiliani's leadership before, during & after 9/11

glenn-k · July 18, 2007, 01:20:50 PM

Put-to-Call Ratio at Highest in 12 Years -- Fast Money Folks Not Worried

http://www.bestcashcow.com/stocks_-_options_-_mutual_funds/all/dans/puttocall-ratio-at-highest-in-12-years-fast-money-folks-not-worried

Last notable time this happened was before 9/11 when gov insiders seeked to profit off their airline stocks falling, from the events about to happen. They knew.

Look for them to pull something else and blame it on Al CIAda.

Sassy · July 18, 2007, 02:23:32 PM

http://www.911blogger.com/node/10025 Richard Gage, AIA, Architect - How The Towers Fell Full Lecture
http://www.911blogger.com/

Also article by Paul Craig Roberts, former Reagon official http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts07162007.html
One of the most influential political figures in America, the "Father of Reaganomics", who is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service, and assistant secretary of treasury under Ronald Reagan, said that the U.S. government may very well carry out false flag attacks in order to get its way

glenn-k · July 21, 2007, 09:03:53 AM

As I mentioned earlier - our finest are at it again -- others feel this is true also.

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/07/chertoff-predicts-simultaneous-lasan.html

glenn-k · July 21, 2007, 10:08:29 AM

http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/135541
Similar article - maybe the same but what I like to read are the views of the world - comments from well educated people around the globe. What do they think of what is going on. :-?

glenn-k · August 01, 2007, 09:34:34 AM

I have felt that this may happen for a long time -- others are now saying the same.

Will Bush Cancel The 2008 Election?

Read the comments afterward to get public opinion about the article.

August 12, 2007, 07:27:15 PM

Don't know if this has already been posted, but...http://youtube.com/watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs
http://youtube.com/watch?v=iY9PqwDIfYw&mode=related&search=

glenn kangiser · August 16, 2007, 01:40:11 AM

They don't fall unless they need to support an agenda.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/150807_not_collapse.htm

glenn kangiser · September 02, 2007, 11:24:13 AM

More people are opening their eyes.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14723997/

Poll reveals 70% now can see the facts of or question the governments involvement in the destruction of the WTC. Add your opinion.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14727720

Sassy · September 03, 2007, 12:28:31 PM

http://www.ae911truth.net/ppt/

A very good "power point" slide show, including videos by Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth.org

The NY Times had an article the other day, asking "why do we have to commemorate the tragedy of 9/11 every year?"

The answer is, when the shills in gov't called our leaders tell the truth!

williet · September 03, 2007, 01:26:18 PM

Quotehttp://www.ae911truth.net/ppt/

A very good "power point" slide show, including videos by Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth.org

The NY Times had an article the other day, asking "why do we have to commemorate the tragedy of 9/11 every year?"

The answer is, when the shills in gov't called our leaders tell the truth!

I believe if the Democrats don't go on to bring to light the Bush/Cheney plan to destroy the United States as we know it, there will be 40 or 50 more years of "he said she said garbage" like the years following our last involvment in someone elses civil war.

It will be a terrible thing to come to the realization that our military was misused and wasted in Iraq because of a corrupt greedy administration, but it would be far better for the future Nation if we can admit the truth and learn from it. If we as a nation would show the world that we will not stand for our leaders lying to us for personal gain.

I believe those who planned/allowed the events of 9/11 should face the music....no matter how up their public office. Treason was once a crime that applied to any citizen.

williet · September 04, 2007, 09:35:46 AM

QuoteI believe they are two arms of the same criminal. Neither party can be trusted to do the will of the people. They answer to a higher calling.

You're right on that, but there's not much choice as things stand today. A third party can't get into the Washington game. A vote for an outsider is wasted. Until there is a MAJOR change in the minds of the majority of citizens, we have to deal with what we have. Congress is more likely to listen because as individuals, they have less power. The President has WAAAY too much power and it seems that office is going to continue to accumulate more and more power until it's a Kingship. Citizens must force their Congressmen to do the job they're given in the Constitution ... to check the power of the President.

As to our government orchestrating 9/11....WWI, the Lusitania was exploded from within as we now know from finding it and investigating it...the "attack" on Pearl Harbor, WWII, was known about at least 6 weeks before it happened and some scholars believe it was no happenstance our navy was ALL in one place at that time.....

When an administration...ANY administration wants a war....we WILL get one.

Sassy · September 04, 2007, 11:29:52 AM

Willet, I am still an optimist - I will vote for Ron Paul - looking at his record, he has always voted according to the constitution - so if anyone is the real deal, he is. If people don't vote or vote for the "lessor of 2 evils" then someone like Ron Paul will not make it.

If nothing else, he has stirred up a lot of discussion & debate on what our current politicians are doing to our country. That is why there is such a huge grassroots following - especially with young people - they want a free country & hopefully will fight for it.

Yes, maybe it is too late, yes, maybe they will try to assassinate Ron Paul - he even admits that... but he loves his country so much that he is willing to take the chance.

The message of Freedom is strong!

williet · September 04, 2007, 01:20:52 PM

For many years I thought that a "little guy" might have a chance, but I now believe that money talks and bull...well you've heard the rest......The President will be either a Democrat or Republican. I believe as to which candidate it really don't matter much....the party platform is what runs the country. It is true that a crazy person like Bush might come along and side step the party every so often, but as a rule...the National organization of each party sets the pace.

SO....

While I may like Ron Paul, the truth is that he has no way in hades of being elected President. AND no matter who is elected President, the desires of the ruling party will be the focus.....because, that's where the money's coming from.

I will vote Democrat because I believe too much freedom is better than not enough. I believe our tax money should go to social programs in place of company pockets. I believe that every person in America has the right to pick and practice the religion of THEIR choice, not the one that I believe in. I believe a mother has the right to choose life or death with her unborn child. She will answer to God for her choice, BUT it IS her choice and not the states. I believe American youth should be the LEADERS of the world and not the police of the world. I believe in a better America over a better middle east and so on .....

I fear that if the Republican's get more control, the United States as we know it will be a thing of the past and the new NEO-CON EMPIRE will seek to rule the world by whatever means available to them.

There are people like Ron Paul who would bring a gift to government, but the reality is they can never get there.....I've been involved with politics and like I said...money talks and ..........

Sassy · September 04, 2007, 09:31:03 PM

These are the things I'm concerned about... we are only living under the guise of freedom - everything is in place to take those freedoms away... does anyone else see it?

Faith, Culture, Politics
Emergency Meeting Called
By Rev. Rich Lang

"We are in a grave constitutional crisis with a President who seemingly wants to be a king, and a Congress unable and unwilling to oppose him.

This administration is building, plank by plank, the framework for military dictatorship. Already in place is a global governing philosophy that uses the military as muscle for invading other nations for the purpose of social engineering and massive corporate profits.

* The Defense Authorization Act of 2006 empowers the President to impose martial law in the event of a terrorist incident.
* The National Defense Authorization Act of 2007 permits the President to command National Guard troops without the consent of state governors.
* The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive gives the President dictatorial powers in the event of a "catastrophic incident."
* The Military Commissions Act suspends the writ of habeas corpus.

This short list doesn't include widespread wiretapping of citizens, construction of concentration camps, private armies, an ever-expanding military budget, increased government secrecy, non-cooperation with Congress, and the inevitable bankrupting of domestic budgets. And, now, the latest grab for power has the Executive announcing that "our property" can be seized for dissent against the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

We are in a very grave constitutional crisis, folks. I encourage every one of you to make a noise in the offices of Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, and your congressional representatives. Silence is the death of democracy.

But I think we also need to begin the process of organizing some form of resistance, protest, and/or strategy for impeachment. Our politicians are fiddling while democracy burns. Feeding from common corporate money sources, they are no longer worthy of our trust. Indeed, they have betrayed us.

For example, almost daily some media figure or political operative drops a hint that our country might be hit again by the terrorists. Ask yourself: In the event of another catastrophic occurrence, can you trust this government to stay true to the idealism of democracy, and the laws of limited checks and balances of power, encoded in the Constitution? Can you trust Congress to represent the people?

I certainly cannot. We are, I repeat, in a grave, surreal even, constitutional crisis. We are dealing with a spirituality of tyranny, an unleashing of ruthless, arrogant power that corrupts all it touches.

It's time to get angry and cast out this unclean spirit from our land. Such a statement can now get me arrested, disappeared, and stripped of all assets. Is this America? Is this the country in which we have been raised? And how long, friend, until you yourself awaken only to discover that there is now a knock on your door?

I call upon all who care to assemble at Trinity United Methodist Church, on Wednesday Aug. 1 at 7 p.m. There we will begin to strategize how to reclaim the power of the people, the birthright we share.
Knock. Knock." (note this was an announcement for a meeting 8/1 but brings up a lot of pertinent concerns)

All you Washingtonins!
From Rev. Rich Lang; Hi folks, COME JOIN US ON 9/11 at 11am
WHERE:
Space Needle
400 Broad St
Seattle, WA 98109

FREEDOM FROM FEAR CAMPAIGN - SEATTLE ACTION 9-11-07

Sassy · September 05, 2007, 02:34:41 PM

Yet another video by a representative of 7000 family members who lost someone on 9/11 questioning the "official" story...

http://www.freepressinternational.com/

tell me again why we are in Iraq?

Sassy · September 05, 2007, 04:29:08 PM

So, if everyone thinks like you do, we'll never have change... we might as well just rollover & play dead :-/
I hate voting for the Republican party, but since Ron Paul is running, I will - I refuse to vote for the "lessor of 2 evils" - I don't see any difference in the democrats or the republicans - they are a divide & conquer distraction.

I guess I could just resign myself & figure it won't matter who wins anyway - that's what Glenn says... & it is probably true, but I will continue to exercise my constitutional right to vote even if the whole thing is rigged.

We're told to "occupy until He comes" & to be "salt & light" - but my ultimate home is not in this fallen world - I will try to do what I can to do a little good, looking towards the hope that has been promised.

At least I can have peace within.

I wonder what others do to find that peace?

MountainDon · September 05, 2007, 05:13:19 PM

Sassy, you mentioned your constitutional right to vote. I'm not picking on you, as this is a common belief. We have the right to vote and we don't. :-/

The Right to Vote

The Constitution contains many phrases, clauses, and amendments detailing ways people cannot be denied the right to vote. You cannot deny the right to vote because of race or gender. Citizens of Washington DC can vote for President; 18-year-olds can vote; you can vote even if you fail to pay a poll tax. The Constitution also requires that anyone who can vote for the "most numerous branch" of their state legislature can vote for House members and Senate members. [highlight]Note that in all of this, though, the Constitution never explicitly ensures the right to vote, as it does the right to speech, for example.[/highlight] This is precisely why so many amendments have been needed over time - the qualifications for voters are left to the states. And as long as the qualifications do not conflict with anything in the Constitution, that right can be withheld. For example, in Texas, persons declared mentally incompetent and felons currently in prison or on probation are denied the right to vote. It is interesting to note that though the 26th Amendment requires that 18-year-olds must be able to vote, states can allow persons younger than 18 to vote, if they chose to.

http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#vote

Sassy · September 05, 2007, 05:51:37 PM

Thank you MtnDon, I'm always open for being educated!

I mouth off so much, don't want to be ranting about stuff that's not true

I'm already accused of being a conspiracy theorist & anti-christ, wouldn't want to be thought of as stupid too

BTW did you watch any of the video? How about the one I posted earlier by architects & engineers? They really bring up a lot of unanswered questions.

MountainDon · September 05, 2007, 09:56:46 PM

Yes Sassy, I did watch the a&e "powerpoint" presentation, at least most of it. I lost interest near the ned when the slides and info on the twin towers began repeating much of the same slides as were used in wtc7.

It did not convince me that there was a conspiracy to demolish the wtc buildings.

One interesting thing is that Jim Hoffman, the expert (appears a couple times, greenish shirt, looks like he's sitting behind a computer monitor) who IS convinced the towers were brought down by demolition charges, at least is NOT a member of the conspiracy camp that believes there was no airplane that hit the Pentagon... that the Pentagon was hit by a missile. So he gained some credibility with me there. But.... I dunno. (this info was not in the presentation... I did some internet research on him.

Which brings up something else. I have an outsized "skeptical bone" when it comes to just about anything, any claims. It takes a lot to prove anything to me. I should have been from Missouri, the "show me state".

The internet especially brings up my screening radar to full power.

One point: re the BBC reporting the collapse of WTC7 20 minutes before it actually fell. The BBC reporter that was seen making the live telecast just happened to be visiting NYC at the time of the attack. She probably wouldn't have known anything about WTC7 even if it fell on her. That would not be the first time a TV reporter made a factual error during a "breaking news" situation.

I find one of life's annoyances are the breaking news interruptions. They seldom have anything to say that couldn't have waited. But that's another rant for another time.

When I was a kid I followed the construction of the towers, it fascinated me. One thing I remember was that Skilling the lead engineer assured all that the towers were built to withstand the impact of the then largest aircraft, the Boeing 707. The designers are also quoted as designing for a slow speed impact, like a plane lost if the fog. What wasn't foreseen was that by 2001 airliners would weigh in at more than 1.75 times the weight of a 707. The planes that hit both WTC towers were 767's and traveling at a high rate of speed. The 767 uses more modern aircraft construction methods that gives more aircraft per pound, has about 2x the range, etc. I don't have the figures but it would seem the 767 carries a lot more fuel than the 707. So who knows what differences that all makes when the crash is analyzed?

So keep on peppering the forum with your thoughts, views, perspectives, etc. I do look at most.

9/11 Anniversary

glenn kangiser

glenn kangiser

Sassy

glenn-k

Sassy

Sassy

glenn-k

glenn-k

glenn-k

Darrin

glenn kangiser

glenn kangiser

Sassy

williet

glenn-k

williet

Sassy

williet

Sassy

Sassy

williet

Sassy

MountainDon

Sassy

MountainDon